The report is NOT unequivocal. If you go to the link today, they have a amendment to the original article saying that lack of editorial review and fact checking had them publish the report as fact when, in truth, most of the claims of the original article are noted (their words) as “possibilities.”
“As part of the editing process, however, we should have made certain that several of the article’s conclusions were presented as possibilities, not as certainties.” According to their editor.
No, sorry, you can’t make a substantial claim out of this, other than what many people seem to be saying — we need to investigate this further. Whatever side you are on in this debate, more facts are needed.
And, isn’t that exactly what Robert Mueller is supposed to be doing?